K-PopK-BeautyK-DramaRankingsK-Influencers
Login

Global K-Culture Media & Community. Your gateway to K-Pop, K-Beauty, K-Drama, and Korean entertainment. Real-time rankings, news, and community.

Company

  • About Kagit
  • K-Influencers
  • For Brands
  • For Creators

Navigation

  • Home
  • K-Pop
  • K-Beauty
  • K-Drama
  • K-Food
  • K-Travel
  • K-Style
  • K-Biz

Rankings

  • All Rankings
  • K-Pop Buzz Chart
  • K-Beauty Ranking
  • K-Drama Chart
  • K-Food Trends
  • K-Style Chart
  • K-Influencer Index

Community

  • Login
  • Bookmarks
  • Settings

Contact

admin@kagit.kr
ServicesKagitkagit.krwishnotewishnote.krComing soonwishnote.twwishnote.tw→ merging into kagit.kr TC

© 2026 Kagit. All rights reserved.

TermsPrivacy
HomeDiscoverRankingsEventsMe
HomeK-Pop[NewJeans Plagiarism Controversy] 'How Sweet' Sued by US Creators, Dispatch Reveals Note-for-Note Comparison
K-Pop

[NewJeans Plagiarism Controversy] 'How Sweet' Sued by US Creators, Dispatch Reveals Note-for-Note Comparison

admin7/13/20263 views 1 min read

NewJeans' hit song 'How Sweet' is caught in a copyright dispute. According to Korean media outlet Dispatch, four American producers and singer-songwriters are accusing ADOR of plagiarizing their song 'One of a Kind' when producing 'How Sweet.' A copyright infringement lawsuit has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, naming HYBE, ADOR, NewJeans, BANA (Beasts & Natives), 250, and other related parties as defendants.

NewJeans' 'How Sweet' is accused of plagiarism, and Dispatch reported on the controversy.
NewJeans' 'How Sweet' is accused of plagiarism, and Dispatch reported on the controversy.

Dispatch First Compares Musical Patterns, Claims Notes in Relevant Sections Are Identical

Dispatch stated that the report began by revealing two audio clips without song titles, asking readers to only listen to the identical rhythm of the two songs. It then presented the song titles and musical patterns, pointing out that the solfège syllables in the relevant sections were identical. The notes listed for both songs were: F F E♭ E♭ B♭ — F F E♭ E♭ B♭ / E♭ E♭ C C A♭ — E♭ E♭ C C A♭.

Dispatch first compared the rhythms of the two songs using untitled clips.
Complaint Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Plaintiff
Defendant
Dispatch first compared the rhythms of the two songs using untitled clips.

The report also recalled that in April 2024, Min Hee-jin publicly expressed dissatisfaction, accusing ILLIT of imitating NewJeans. At the time, she specifically questioned the group's direction, album design, and key choreography, stating: "Why are they using our key choreography without our consent? Our choreographers are very angry." However, 'How Sweet,' released after these accusations, is now embroiled in a controversy over whether it used 'One of a Kind' without authorization.

廣告
廣告
廣告
廣告
A

admin

comments (0)

0

Related Posts

【aespa日本場】Karina短裙造型瘋傳！一句「夾我的頭」成焦點K-Pop

【aespa日本場】Karina短裙造型瘋傳！一句「夾我的頭」成焦點

aespa Karina在日本粉絲見面會穿制服短裙登台，身形與裙長引發社群討論。

Yan11 hours ago155
遭一前任狠甩4次！東方神起允浩鬆口分手原因　痛認：我是很糟糕的男人K-Pop

遭一前任狠甩4次！東方神起允浩鬆口分手原因　痛認：我是很糟糕的男人

K氏鄉民12 hours ago
Dispatch lists the musical patterns and song titles of the two songs for comparison.
Pa Pa Re Re Si Pa Pa Re Re Si
Mi Mi Do La Mi Mi Do Do La > Mi Do / Mi Mi Mi Mi Mi Pa Pa La
Pa Pa Re Re Si Pa Pa Re Re Si Mi Mi Do Do La Mi Mi Do Do La Mi Mi Do Do La Mi Mi Do Do La Re Re Si
Dispatch lists the musical patterns and song titles of the two songs for comparison.

Four American Creators Sue, Lawyer Expresses Disappointment Over 'Obvious Appropriation'

Dispatch claims to have obtained the complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, analyzed 'One of a Kind' and 'How Sweet,' and corresponded with the plaintiffs' lawyer via email to understand the case background. The plaintiffs' lawyer stated: "Adam, Aidan, Audrey, and Michael are accomplished creators, and they are very disappointed to find their original song so obviously copied."

According to Dispatch's summary, BANA had given an instrumental track to the American publishing company Pulse Music, requesting the completion of a "top line" (main melody/vocal melody). Pulse Music then commissioned American creator Audrey Amacost, who, along with Aidan Rodriguez, Michael Campanelli, and Adam Gokcebay, completed the top line. The four then submitted the finished product to Pulse, which in turn passed it to BANA.

Two weeks later, Audrey and her collaborators received a rejection notice from BANA, stating: "We liked the top line but ultimately decided not to use it." However, four months later, 'How Sweet' was officially released. The plaintiffs argue: "The top line we submitted to BANA was used. BANA CEO Kim Ki-hyun and their A&R staff could not have been unaware of this."

Original image showing relevant music analysis content.
Structural Similarity
Pa Re Si Pa Re Si
Mi Do La
Pa Re Si Pa Re Si
Mi Do La
Do La Mi Do La
Original image showing relevant music analysis content.

Controversial Sections: Same Time Signature, Key, Tempo

The controversial sections compared by Dispatch are from 0:30 to 0:43 in 'One of a Kind' and from 0:08 to 0:20 in 'How Sweet.' Dispatch claims this key melody appears twice in each song. The report points out that both songs are in 4/4 time, B♭ minor, and have the same tempo of 125 BPM; these elements can be attributed to the instrumental track provided by the NewJeans side.

Regarding the core of the plagiarism claim, Dispatch reports that both songs use C♭ instead of the naturally occurring C in the B♭ minor scale. This note, not belonging to the scale, is considered a "tension note" that creates tension in the song. The report also states that this is not a common musical trope that anyone would easily use.

The report summarizes the controversial sections of 'One of a Kind' and 'How Sweet'.
The report summarizes the controversial sections of 'One of a Kind' and 'How Sweet'.

Dispatch further points out that the key to this controversy lies in the melody. The pitch sequence of 'One of a Kind' and 'How Sweet' is almost identical, with eighth notes repeating before resolving to quarter notes, consistent rhythmic patterns, and similar accents. Both songs also exhibit a stepwise descending scale structure: F → E♭ → B♭ / E♭ → C → A♭ / E♭ → C♭ → A♭.

It is extremely difficult for the solfège syllables, note lengths, tension notes, and rhythms of the top lines of two songs to be all identical. Selecting a melody that sounds and looks the same cannot be explained by coincidence.

Korean Music Expert

Responsibility Becomes Focus, Kim Ki-hyun's Role Highlighted

Dispatch reports that BANA CEO Kim Ki-hyun is Min Hee-jin's self-admitted "ex-ex-ex-boyfriend" and her former music partner, who was responsible for NewJeans' A&R. 'How Sweet' was indeed sourced by Kim Ki-hyun. The report also states that Min Hee-jin pays Kim Ki-hyun a monthly service fee of 33 million Korean Won (approximately US$21,900, or NT$650,000), plus a bonus of about 5% of revenue, totaling over 1 billion Korean Won (approximately US$663,000, or NT$19.7 million).

In the buyback rights lawsuit with HYBE, Min Hee-jin actively denied favoring Kim Ki-hyun and refuted allegations of breach of trust. She stated: "That was just the amount I proposed because I believed that if I were to work with him at that level, those conditions would be necessary. I place great importance on fair compensation for others. Kim Ki-hyun is not a composer, so he cannot collect royalties, which is a blind spot. That's why I proposed that amount, believing that if he were to work with me at this level, he would need to receive such compensation."

After reviewing the production credits for 'How Sweet,' Dispatch pointed out that Min Hee-jin is the executive producer and Kim Ki-hyun is the A&R director. The report also explained that in the K-pop production system, a core responsibility of A&R includes confirming rights such as song acquisition and copyright clearance.

Min Hee-jin once said, 'Kim Ki-hyun is NewJeans. He produced all the songs.' Kim Ki-hyun received our song; he cannot claim he didn't know.

Plaintiffs

Plaintiffs' lawyer Trevor Barrett also told Dispatch: "We are very disappointed that our song was so obviously appropriated in 'How Sweet.' We hope that through this lawsuit, our rights can be properly restored."

'How Sweet' Sells Over 1.3 Million Copies, ADOR Responds

'How Sweet' has sold over 1.3 million copies as of June 2026, peaked at No. 15 on the Global 200, and was selected by Rolling Stone as one of the 100 best songs of 2024. In response to Dispatch's inquiry, ADOR briefly replied: "'How Sweet' is a song acquired through BANA, and we are currently checking the status of the sound source similarity review conducted at the time."

ADOR told Dispatch that they are checking the status of the sound source similarity review at the time.
ADOR told Dispatch that they are checking the status of the sound source similarity review at the time.

Dispatch finally stated that OK Records and BANA could not be reached for comment.

1,307
醫美灼傷後判若兩人！前AOA珉娥素顏近照曝光　網嚇喊：要照顧身體K-Pop

醫美灼傷後判若兩人！前AOA珉娥素顏近照曝光　網嚇喊：要照顧身體

南韓女團AOA前成員、現轉戰演員的權珉娥近日在社群分享一系列素顏自拍，雖然白皙透亮的膚況和清純氣質獲得不少稱讚，但她明顯消瘦的模樣也讓不少粉絲相當擔心，紛紛留言希望她能好好照顧身體。事實上，她今年初才因醫美療程發生意外，導致臉部二度灼傷，一度面臨近乎毀容的危機。

K氏鄉民13 hours ago1,490

Trending now

  1. 1

    Song Ji-hyo's Casual Hairstyles Spark Debate, Even Her Styling Team Expresses Frustration

    13K views
  2. 2

    NewJeans Announces Four-Member Comeback; Danielle's Cryptic Post Sparks Speculation

    4.5K views
  3. 3

    NewJeans' Four-Member Comeback Teasers Draw Harsh Criticism from Art Director

    1.8K views
  4. 4

    NewJeans Returns as Four-Member Group for 4th Anniversary, Sparks Debate Over Danielle's Absence and Concept Shift

    1.7K views
  5. 5

    Former AOA Member Kwon Mina Shares Barefaced Selfies, Fans Express Concern Over Weight Loss After Cosmetic Procedure Injury

    1.5K views

Cheer the stars of this story

  • Ne
    NewJeans

    Cheer Level 0

    0
    Your Cheers
  • HY
    HYBE

    Cheer Level 0

    0
    Your Cheers

Log in to start collecting cheers on this article:

  • Read +5
  • Early reader +5 · 20 spots left
  • Comment +10
  • First comment +20
Log in for the early-reader bonus — 20 spots left